Midnight and the close of the 2012 legislative session were around the corner (10:02 pm) when the Georgia Senate passed HB 875 on a 48-2 vote. The bill that the Senate voted on was substantially different from the version it passed less than 12 hours earlier; however, the Senator didn’t share that bit of information with his peers. By the time the House rejected the bill, only an hour later, word of the deceit had bypassed circumvented the mute Republican leadership via the magic of zeros-and-ones.

Has old school political machination met its match with digital networking?

According to Tom Baxter, the bill was initially designed “to prevent the release of the personal information people give to obtain hunting and fishing licenses.”

A good ol’ boy bill, in other words.

What Sen. John Bulloch (R) did not tell his colleagues when he brought the bill up for  final vote: the bill had been seriously revised by the conference committee, a rewrite expansive enough to slide an 18-wheeler through, sideways. The new bill would have given the state ethics commission the authority (1) to seal the records of some cases involving politicians, effectively hiding them from the public, and (2) to waive late fees for politicians and lobbyists who don’t meet state reporting requirements.

When the modified bill came up for a vote on the House side, Rep. David Knight (R), like Bulloch in the Senate, kept  his lips sealed with regard to the changes. Reportedly, he also refused to take questions from his peers.

The re-written bill met a crushing the defeat, 143-25 (11:08 pm).

What happened in the hour between Senate passage and the House vote?

According to the AJC:

Within minutes of the Senate vote, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution had posted what happened on Twitter and Facebook; good-government lobbyists in the hall figured out what was going on; political bloggers picked up on it.

According to Baxter:

What was happening, pretty much in real time with the vote, was the spreading awareness across the House floor of Twitter dispatches by the AJC’s James Salzer and Peach Pundit’s Charlie Harper (and perhaps others I’m not aware of). The measure had been put in the internet sunshine, and the reaction was very speedy.

What I could find to document those two claims:

There was other opposition that AJC and Baxter did not mention: Debbie Dooley, a coordinator for the Georgia Tea Party Patriots, “frantically” lobbied against the bill.

I think it’s pretty safe to say that had there not been a heads-up in the digital information space that the bill could well have sailed through the House as easily as it did through the Senate. Would there have been enough post-session grief for the governor to decline his signature? Who knows.

What a despicable way to get to sine die:

  • First, “[t]he chairman of the ethics commission, Kevin Abernethy, said he was never consulted on the bill.”
  • Second, neither legislative leader told his peers about the substantive changes in a very minor bill.
  • Third, the bill languished for a month after being passed by the House, and then the Senate voted on it twice the last day of the session!
Perhaps it will come as no surprise that “Georgia ranks 50th with a grade of F and a numerical score of 49 from the State Integrity Investigation, a collaborative project of the Center for Public Integrity, Global Integrity and Public Radio International.”

Chalk one up for the good guys, and, perhaps, another one for social. And let’s not forget the political reporters on the scene, reporting the news that needed to be shared.

Cross-posted at TheModerateVoice; follow me on Twitter!

Written by Kathy E. Gill

Digital evangelist, speaker, writer, educator. Transplanted Southerner; teach newbies to ride motorcycles! @kegill

This article has 1 comments

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.