Open Access Proponents Derail Elsevier-Backed Publishing Restriction

open access uk Academics and researchers who support open access to research were able to take a (short) victory lap on Monday. Legislation that would have prevented federal agencies from publishing publicly-funded research results without the approval of the originating journal died after Dutch publishing giant Elsevier pulled its support.

According to the Congressional Research Service, the Research Works Act (HR 3699, emphasis added) would have prohibited

a federal agency from adopting, maintaining, continuing, or otherwise engaging in any policy, program, or other activity that: (1) causes, permits, or authorizes network dissemination of any ["research funded in whole or in part by a federal agency"] without the prior consent of the publisher; or (2) requires that any actual or prospective author, or the author’s employer, assent to such network dissemination.

The proposed legislation contradicted the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy (2008) which requires that NIH-funded researchers submit their manuscripts to the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed Central “no later than 12 months after the official date of publication.”

Continue reading

On Trust and Privacy: Why I No Longer Trust Google

Trust.

It’s a key factor in any successful relationship, whether that relationship is between two people or a person and an organization.

Privacy concerns are ongoing and have been around on the web for a long time. Kee Hinckley wrote about them in 1999. Among privacy advocates, discussions about “do not track” go back at least four years; then in 2010, the FTC endorsed the idea. (As did Mozilla in 2011.) There’s the W3C Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P), now suspended, and a new W3C tracking protection group.

Although it hasn’t been battered with privacy-related consumer trust headlines as frequently as Facebook (Beacon, 2007, 2007, 2009; privacy settings, 2009, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2011, 2012; tracking, 20112012; FTC settlement, 2011), Google has flirted with trust issues since at least 2004. That’s when Dave Winer warned:

Continue reading

Ticketmaster Customers: Check Your Spam Folder

From the “you may have missed this in real time” department:

If you are an online Ticketmaster customer, you may be eligible for a $1.50 per purchase discount on tickets purchased from 2012-2016. No joy, it seems, for those who buy tickets from November 2011 until the settlement is finalized and discounts distributed by email (not before May 2012).

The announcement subject line is “Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action;” the sending email, ticketfeelitigation@tgcginc.com. You not only need to check your spam folder; you need to think about old email addresses. How many people have kept the same email address on their Ticketmaster account for 12 years? I haven’t.

Continue reading

Federal Judge Refuses To Return Domain Names, Claims Loss Not “Substantial Hardship”

Seized ServersAccording to New York Federal District Court Judge Paul A. Crotty, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) does not have to return two domain names that the government seized earlier this year. The primary reason given? The Spanish company has registered alternate domain names.

The domain names were seized in February due to claims (probably by FOX) of copyright infringement. However, Puerto 80 has prevailed in Spanish courts — twice — when challenged that content on Rojadirecta.com and Rojadirecta.org violated copyright. The site is an index (portal) to online sports events but also hosts discussion forums. It contains no advertising, and it hosts no content. Coincidentally (not!), the seizure happened just before the 2011 Superbowl, which was broadcast by FOX.

From the ruling (pdf) (emphasis added):

Continue reading