<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Motrin Responds To Online Backlash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wiredpen.com/2008/11/18/motrin-responds-to-online-backlash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wiredpen.com/2008/11/18/motrin-responds-to-online-backlash/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 06:38:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnson &#38; Johnson Under Fire For Recalls &#171; WiredPen</title>
		<link>http://wiredpen.com/2008/11/18/motrin-responds-to-online-backlash/#comment-21342</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnson &#38; Johnson Under Fire For Recalls &#171; WiredPen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 15:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiredpen.com/?p=1098#comment-21342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and infants by McNeil Consumer Healthcare, a division of J&amp;J. Also in 2008: the infamous &#8220;Motrin Moms&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and infants by McNeil Consumer Healthcare, a division of J&amp;J. Also in 2008: the infamous &#8220;Motrin Moms&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Week 5 : Wealth of Networks (2) &#171; Economics of Digital Communication</title>
		<link>http://wiredpen.com/2008/11/18/motrin-responds-to-online-backlash/#comment-21088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Week 5 : Wealth of Networks (2) &#171; Economics of Digital Communication]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiredpen.com/?p=1098#comment-21088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Motrin Moms [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Motrin Moms [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #AmazonFail &#171; WiredPen</title>
		<link>http://wiredpen.com/2008/11/18/motrin-responds-to-online-backlash/#comment-20915</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[#AmazonFail &#171; WiredPen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 02:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiredpen.com/?p=1098#comment-20915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] meme is far more viral than Motrin or Skittles for two (probable) reasons: there are more people in the Twitterverse and the topic is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] meme is far more viral than Motrin or Skittles for two (probable) reasons: there are more people in the Twitterverse and the topic is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Motrin feels the pain of a social media mommy mob &#124; The Responsible Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://wiredpen.com/2008/11/18/motrin-responds-to-online-backlash/#comment-20772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Motrin feels the pain of a social media mommy mob &#124; The Responsible Marketing Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiredpen.com/?p=1098#comment-20772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Update: Here&#8217;s a spoof of the Motrin ad, via wiredpen.com [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Here&#8217;s a spoof of the Motrin ad, via wiredpen.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Short</title>
		<link>http://wiredpen.com/2008/11/18/motrin-responds-to-online-backlash/#comment-20771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry Short]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiredpen.com/?p=1098#comment-20771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an ad guy, my first reaction to this phenom of the social networking hammer scaring yet another advertiser into submission is: Dear Gawd, it&#039;s tough enough to get anything provocative through the client&#039;s bland-o-fier these days without having to vet every idea  for potential kabooms from every networked, hair-trigger constituency out there. 

On the bright side, the Motrin episode has finally inspired the answer to the increasingly frequent client question: &quot;How can we use social networking to sell more widgets?&quot;

1) We do one cheap 30-second spot on local TV  that includes a minor element  guaranteed to piss off a subculture of ferociously networked  bulldogs who aren&#039;t in your target audience.
2) They raise a stink and demand that you immediately pull the ad.
3) You refuse and tell them to get a life. 
4) They blog ballistic. You get a zillion dollars worth of free publicity.
5) They can&#039;t believe you defied them and launch a national boycott against you. 
6) This has no effect on sales because they never bought your widgets in the first place.
7) You repeat your refusal to pull the ad, but you no longer have to pay to run it because it&#039;s now running for free all over the place.
8) Oprah offers to broker a peace in prime time between you and the head of the boycott.
9) You announce your intention to run the ad on the Super Bowl and offer to pay for your opponent to have a sense-of-humor transplant.
7) You win the undying brand loyalty of the widget-buying silent majority who agree with you.
8) I win an Effie Award for the most sales ever generated from a single commercial. And I finally get an ad on the Super Bowl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an ad guy, my first reaction to this phenom of the social networking hammer scaring yet another advertiser into submission is: Dear Gawd, it&#8217;s tough enough to get anything provocative through the client&#8217;s bland-o-fier these days without having to vet every idea  for potential kabooms from every networked, hair-trigger constituency out there. </p>
<p>On the bright side, the Motrin episode has finally inspired the answer to the increasingly frequent client question: &#8220;How can we use social networking to sell more widgets?&#8221;</p>
<p>1) We do one cheap 30-second spot on local TV  that includes a minor element  guaranteed to piss off a subculture of ferociously networked  bulldogs who aren&#8217;t in your target audience.<br />
2) They raise a stink and demand that you immediately pull the ad.<br />
3) You refuse and tell them to get a life.<br />
4) They blog ballistic. You get a zillion dollars worth of free publicity.<br />
5) They can&#8217;t believe you defied them and launch a national boycott against you.<br />
6) This has no effect on sales because they never bought your widgets in the first place.<br />
7) You repeat your refusal to pull the ad, but you no longer have to pay to run it because it&#8217;s now running for free all over the place.<br />
8) Oprah offers to broker a peace in prime time between you and the head of the boycott.<br />
9) You announce your intention to run the ad on the Super Bowl and offer to pay for your opponent to have a sense-of-humor transplant.<br />
7) You win the undying brand loyalty of the widget-buying silent majority who agree with you.<br />
8) I win an Effie Award for the most sales ever generated from a single commercial. And I finally get an ad on the Super Bowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

