Interface Ugliness

The Hill Screenshot

Forget, for a moment, that the design of the above-the-fold portion of this website is ugly as sin, crowded with ads and “junk” (hat tip, Edward Tufte). Look at the ad, sitting front and center!

It’s blocking the copy — the only reason we’ve come to this page. Yes, I know that lots of publishers are doing this these days. That doesn’t make it right — it makes it intrusive, in the same manner as television ads. And people like these just as little as they like TV ads (in general, Super Bowl excepted!).

Look closely (click to view the larger image) and you’ll also see that there is no close option on the ad. Yipes! How are we supposed to dismiss the ad to read the content?

Unlike many of these floating ads, this one did not time out. It was still present hours after I first looked at the page. It did, however, disappear with a page refresh.

Pfizer: fire your online ad team. In addition to being annoying, it looks like a Liberty Mutual ad.

Publishers: just say no. There has to be a better business model than this.

For additional commentary on user experience and design, check out the <TFM> archives.

4 comments on “Interface Ugliness”

  1. kegill Reply

    Hi, Adri .. but at what price? How many people are *POed* and leave? Or have a bad taste in their mouth about the advertiser?

  2. Adri Reply

    Wow! That is bad NO time and NO close out link?!

    As much as I hate them, big pop ups like this do work a lot better than side banners (they indeed have better click troughs and better conversions), so when you are doing media buys agencies will recommend this intrusive unit. But, they really should provide a close out option because they will mess up your reports showing high interaction rates but low click through.

    -Adri

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: