These days, it’s rare that I have the opportunity to attend a newsworthy event and then read about it afterward, contrasting my experience with the ‘reported’ facts. So I relished the opportunity to see how the Kerry speech was reported, both locally and nationally.
Locally, the most obvious was positioning in the printed paper. The Seattle P-I placed the story above the fold, with full-width headline. The Seattle Times placed the story below the fold, in the right column; they placed far more emphasis on a Microsoft campus being built in India. Web site placement and column inches continued that trend. I have to re-think my subscription to The Times.
“Attack” charged
If I failed to mention it yesterday, I found Kerry’s tone and words to be extremely measured. He didn’t (proverbially) froth at the mouth. His dispatchment of Administration shortcomings was, in my view, indirect. He mentioned the Bush Administration by name once; he mentioned the President by name once.
Continue reading →